← Parallel and combined circuits

Why more branches mean less resistance

In brief

A battery drives one lamp, and the supply ammeter reads 0.6 A. A second, identical lamp is wired in parallel. The reading climbs to 1.2 A.

A0.6 Aone lampA1.2 Atwo lamps in parallel
The same 6 V battery. With a second lamp in parallel, the supply ammeter reads twice as much.

The new branch has the full 6 V across it, so it draws its own 0.6 A. The first branch is untouched: still 6 V across it, still 0.6 A through it. The battery now supplies both branches at once.

Same source voltage, twice the current. A circuit that lets more current flow at the same voltage is opposing the current less — its resistance is lower.

The resistance falls because each added branch opens another path for charge to flow, so more total current flows for the same source voltage, meaning the combination opposes the current less.

Neither lamp changed. Each lamp keeps its own resistance; it is the combination that resists less. That is why the more-resistors trap fails: a new resistor does not add opposition when it opens a new path.

Check what you know

A third identical heater joins two heaters already in parallel. What happens to the supply current?

Why does adding a parallel branch lower the combined resistance?

One branch of a parallel pair is disconnected. What happens to the combined resistance of what remains?

Adding a component raises the total resistance in one circuit type and lowers it in the other. Which pairing is right?