← The direction of change

Why there's no going back

A bakery's door opens onto the street, and the smell of fresh bread drifts down the block.

The aroma spread out of the bakery, and it never funnels itself back inside. Why is there no going back?

The aroma's particles left through the doorway and drifted among the air's particles, farther and wider every minute.

For the smell to return, every one of those spread particles would have to drift back through the one doorway at once, into the concentrated arrangement they started in.

bakery doorbeforebakery doorafter
The aroma's two arrangements. The return trip from right panel to left panel is the one nobody ever sees.
Real processes are irreversible because energy and matter drift toward the arrangement that is overwhelmingly most likely, and spread-out arrangements vastly outnumber concentrated ones.

So a spontaneous return to the concentrated arrangement is never observed.

Energy conservation alone would allow the return; no energy rule blocks it. Likelihood is what rules it out.

The same reasoning covers energy. Thermal energy that spread from hot brakes into a road never drifts back into the brakes; the spread arrangement is overwhelmingly the likely one, so it is the one that stays.

iceskaterpositions at equal time ticksslightly warmslightly warm
The energy side of the same story: read right to left, this strip is the film that never plays.

That is why there is no going back. Nothing blocks the return; it is simply never the arrangement that turns up.

The two arrangements, comparedarrangementhow it comparesthe aroma clustered at the doorwayconcentrated: one special arrangementthe aroma scattered down the blockspread out: overwhelmingly the likely kind
Spread-out arrangements vastly outnumber concentrated ones. The likely kind is the kind that stays.

Steam has spread from a shower through an apartment. Why does the steam never crowd itself back into the shower stall?

The crowded-back arrangement is concentrated; the drifted one is spread out.

Energy and matter drift toward the arrangement that is overwhelmingly most likely, and spread-out arrangements vastly outnumber concentrated ones.

A spontaneous return to the concentrated arrangement is never observed, so the steam never crowds back.

A rice cooker cooled after dinner, and its thermal energy spread into the kitchen. Why will it never gather that energy back and reheat itself?

Reheating would need the spread energy back in one concentrated arrangement.

Spread-out arrangements vastly outnumber concentrated ones, so the drift never runs toward the gathered arrangement.

The gathered arrangement is never the one that turns up, so the cooker never reheats itself.

Air from a popped party balloon has spread through a gym. Will the air ever crowd itself back into one balloon-shaped cluster, on its own?

A cup of cocoa cooled in a den, and its thermal energy spread into the room. Why does that energy stay in the room instead of returning to the cocoa?

Jola says: 'The thermal energy that spread from a cooling bowl of soup into a kitchen will never gather itself back into the bowl, because spread-out arrangements vastly outnumber concentrated ones.' Is she correct?

Your turn

A tray of hot wings cooled at a tailgate, and the energy spread into the outdoor air. Why will that energy never gather itself back and reheat the wings?

Could the thermal energy spread through a lake ever collect itself into one warm cupful of water, given a long enough wait?

Which of the following statements says why real processes are irreversible?