← Speed and velocity; scalars and vectors

Scalars: complete with a size alone

A robot vacuum wanders a living room and shuts down 3 m west of the charging dock where it began. What is its displacement?

You've already worked with quantities of two kinds without naming them. A distance answers 'how far?' completely on its own. A displacement is not complete until a direction is attached. The complete-on-its-own kind gets its name here.

A quantity that is fully described by a size alone is called a scalar. A distance of 70 m needs no direction to be complete; a time of 25 s needs none either.

The test: ask 'which way?' of the quantity. For a scalar the question has no answer. It does not even apply, and that unanswerable question is the mark of a scalar.
ask 'which way?' of each quantityquantityask 'which way?'complete?a distance of 70 mthe question does not applycomplete as it standsa time of 25 sthe question does not applycomplete as it standsa displacement of 70 mneeds an answerincomplete without onea velocity of 3 m/sneeds an answerincomplete without one

A stopwatch shows 85 s. Why is this measurement a scalar?

An oven timer runs for 600 s. Ask 'which way?' of 600 s: the question does not apply to a time. The size alone fully describes it, so '600 s' is complete. Time is a scalar.

A pedometer shows 5000 m walked today. Distance is the length of path covered, whichever way the walking went, so its size alone fully describes it. '5000 m' is complete. Distance is a scalar.

A hiker reports: 'I walked 12 km today.' A friend asks: 'Which way?' The hiker answers: 'That doesn't change what I said.' Why is the hiker right?

Your turn

Quantity 1: the 90 s a song lasts. Quantity 2: a chess piece's displacement, two squares toward the opponent. Which of the two is a scalar?

Which of these four is a scalar?

A student says: '70 m is a scalar when it measures the distance walked, but 70 m is not a complete description when it measures a displacement.' Is the student right?